Judicial Misconduct in OC? Judge’s Threats Against Mother Over Media Coverage Become Reality
The Case of Taran Strong
Newly scheduled court hearings in the Nolan v. Nolan case suggest that previous judicial threats of contempt, mistrial, and sanctions were not mere courtroom rhetoric but are now unfolding as reality.
Judge Kimberly A. Carasso of Superior Court of California, County of Orange has scheduled multiple upcoming hearings, echoing those held in January:
March 25, 2025 – Two domestic violence matters, a trial-setting conference, and an RFO (Request for Order) on modification of custody, visitation, and support.
March 26, 2025 – Two domestic violence matters, a trial-setting conference, and an RFO on custody, visitation, and support.
April 7, 2025 – Two domestic violence matters, a trial-setting conference, and an RFO on custody, visitation, and support.
Courtroom Outburst and Judicial Retaliation?
These hearings follow a pivotal evidentiary hearing held the week of January 27, 2025, where, for the first time, medical professionals testified about abuse, neglect, and the traumatic brain injury suffered by Tar Nolan of Taran Strong.
This testimony was expected to be a turning point in the case.
Judicial Misconduct and Gag Orders?
Allegedly, a dramatic outburst from Judge Kimberly A. Carasso was triggered by this reporter’s coverage of the case. The judge reportedly threatened to declare a mistrial, hold parties in contempt, impose sanctions, and strike expert witness testimony—raising serious concerns about judicial impartiality and press freedom.
As previously reported, the judge’s reaction appears to have been directly influenced by media scrutiny, with her threats now materializing in court proceedings. This raises further concerns about judicial retaliation, due process violations, and attempts to silence public scrutiny in a case already riddled with procedural irregularities.
Exacerbating these concerns is a blanket gag order imposed by Judge Carasso, which effectively silences one party in the dispute. Broad, indefinite gag orders are highly unusual and may violate constitutional protections on free speech and due process.
A Controversial DVRO and ADA Concerns
A temporary Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) has remained in place against Tar Nolan for over two years, allegedly based on significant misrepresentations made by the father in his initial application.
The prolonged nature of this “temporary” order raises serious legal and ethical questions. Typically, DVROs are short-term protective measures, requiring clear, substantiated evidence before being extended for years. The circumstances surrounding this case suggest a potential abuse of legal mechanisms to gain leverage in the custody battle.
Additionally, the prolonged DVRO and gag order may violate both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the First Amendment by restricting her ability to advocate for herself, access necessary accommodations in court proceedings, and speak publicly about her case.
Public Access to the Nolan v. Nolan Hearings
For those following the case, remote public access to Orange County family law hearings is available through the court’s official website:
👉 Family Law Video Appearances
To listen in, select Department L60, where the Nolan v. Nolan hearings are scheduled.
For in-person court watching, the hearings will take place at:
Lamoreaux Justice Center
341 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868
Department L60
A Larger Pattern of Family Court Failures?
The Nolan v. Nolan case is not occurring in isolation. It is part of a larger crisis within California’s family court system, where allegations of bias, corruption, and lack of judicial oversight are becoming increasingly public.
Related Coverage on the Nolan Case:
Injustice in OC: Mom of “Tar’s Road to Recovery” Faces Prolonged Separation from Her Kids
Update: “Tar’s Road to Recovery” Mom Bullied by OC Minors’ Counsel in Fight Over Special Needs Trust
Orange County Judges Block Public and Media from Court Hearings
OC Judge Threatens Mistrial, Sanctions, Contempt, and Striking Expert Witness Testimony Weaponized Gag Orders: How an OC Judge Is Silencing a Quadriplegic Mother’s Fight for Justice
Further Investigative Reporting on Orange County’s Family Court Crisis:
OC Man Charged with 5 Felony Counts of Molestation: Family Court and CPS Ignored Reports for Years
California Judges: The good, the bad, and the…Orange County, part two
Whistleblowers expose the Orange County family court crisis
Whistleblowers reveal corruption in Orange County family courts and beyond
California’s Family Court Crisis: The Failure of Oversight and the Impact of Dr. Sue Tonkins
California Family Courts: Dr. Joan Meier Exposes Bias and Systemic Failures
OC Bar Association says “I just want to protect my children” means “I just want to screw my ex”
Unchecked family policing in California: cps, family court, and foster care under fire
Call to Action: Share Your Story
If you or someone you know has experienced similar due process violations, judicial misconduct, or unjust restraining orders within the California family court system, please reach out.
Contact: juliea005@proton.me
Support Investigative Journalism:
This article is made possible by reader donations. Support my work and help expose family court corruption by donating here or by paid subscription. Thank you for your support!
Im surprised Stacey Kinney is not involved in this case.... she LOVES the corrupt judges and they LOVE her too!!!! She helps keep the corruption going, and makes sure to silence mothers and children with her "professional" AFCC ways, aka abusive father loving mother hating ways. Pure evil
Maybe its the Lamareaux L60 corruption? Thats where Andre De La Cruz was, arguably the worst OC judge for biased and illegal orders made in family courts. But then again its almost every courtroom that has some form of corruption thanks to the list of corrupt professionals that judges refer to. Welcome to OC family court: home to the most corrupt and evil judges!!!! Hell yes misconduct happens.... every single day in family court. Why do you think they make illegal gag orders and block outsiders stating its "sealed" or "locked" courtrooms? Its not to protect kids i can tell you that with certainty